Reviews of Mohammed's Koran

From around the world, some of the hundreds of 5 star reviews Mohammed's Koran received in the first few months following publication.  Each review comes from someone who bought the book.  If you are skeptical of any review, a URL is provided at the end of each review, so you can verify each review.

An essential read...

Whilst many in the west have chosen to bury their heads in the sand, Peter McLoughlin has made the brave and courageous decision to stand up and be counted. His books (Easy Meat and Mohammed's Koran) meticulously dissect the controversial issues of grooming gangs and Islamic terrorism with an inspiring academic zeal. In a world where, all too easily, concerned voices are silenced by cries of 'racism, xenophobia and islamophobia' these books with their detailed references and appendices prove themselves to be credible and correctly legitimise the concerns of many. I hope people will read these books and learn from the mistakes of our leaders. To be educated on the subjects of grooming gangs and Islamic terrorism is important, so as not to fall victim to the rape gangs and to not be confused as to what is going on in the wake of another suicide bombing.

Great work...

A long overdue simplification of the quagmire that is Islam. No where to hide now for taqqyia artists.

This is a masterpiece...

A must-read for anyone wanting to dispel the fog created by the modern-day historical revisionists - those cowards and quislings dominating modern media and academia. Contrary to the idiot, illiterate trolls posting 1-star reviews, there is plenty of scholarship here. (Don't be put off by Amazon's typo in the book description; it's not 1463 pages long, but 400.) 94 of those pages are a detailed, near-book-length Introduction, of some 50,000 words, which is copiously footnoted, with detailed cross-references. The Footnotes section is 50 pages long, with a font-size even smaller than the main text ... probably equal to at least another 125 pages of text at normal sizing. 563 footnotes in all, plus Bibliography, and Indices. Plenty of documentation for those who demand "What are your sources?" (A demand never made of leftist interviewees of network TV shows.) I've read McLoughlin's previous book, "Easy Meat," about the child-rape Muslim grooming gangs in Rotherham (and elsewhere) in the U.K. (That, too, was thoroughly researched and documented, and is also a must-read.) In particular, "Easy Meat" illustrates how totalitarian political correctness, and a deathly fear of being called 'racist,' led public authorities to turn a blind eye to the rape of a generation of young English Kuffar girls ... as sanctioned by the Koran. (And who would call those police and social workers 'racist'? Why, the media of course ... those self-appointed watchdogs and guardians of our liberty!) I've also read Tommy Robinson's "Enemy of the State," and it, too, is a block-buster expose of the extent to which we have all been betrayed by our governing 'elites'. The so-called 'Rule of Law' has been discarded. Both these authors are modern-day heroes, shining examples of courage for the rest of us to listen to and heed. They are on the barricades, the front-lines against the barbarians. They speak from personal experience. We in North America ignore at our mortal peril their warnings. The book is very well-written, and builds, point-by-point, in logical sequence (unlike the fevered ad hominems of the 1-star crowd).

Unexpectedly academic...

Doubtless some people may bought this book hoping it to be an easy way to discredit Tommy Robinson. Sadly any such reader is going to be in for a bit of a shock. It's not some "racist" diatribe written by a mindless thicko but a well written background introduction and then the Koran in reverse chronological order. It succinctly lays out the historical development of Islam and introduces Western readers to the key concept of "abrogation". Reading the Koran verses you do quickly get the sense of how despised non-Muslims are and this should be concerning to other cultures. We may want to see them as friends and equals - they do not (or at least their religion doesn't). Islam as a way of life, more so than a religion, teaches it's adherents to force conversion/murder or simply exorbitantly tax those who won't convert. I daresay the murder/tax decision is based on how threatened they feel. In either case this is hardly good news for minority non-Muslim communities. It does seem hard to draw a line between "radical" and "non-radical" Muslims assuming they are both reading the same book -it's a book teaching love & respect to other Muslims and death/oppression to everyone else. A clearer distinction to my mind would be "activist" vs "non-activist" and it would be helpful if our politicians understood this better.